Friday, September 16, 2011

Counter top heights lawsuit 378

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Louie v BFS Retail & Commercial Operations 178 Cal.App.4th (2009) (3) Disabled customer L sued B over countertop heights.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Claim not barred by prior class-action decree on ADA cases–where decree expressly reserved any damage claim–is not res judicata to state-law damage action. San Diego personal injury attorney.

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:16:14 | Permalink | Comments Off

Bus driver fired for performance trouble 383

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Harris v City of Santa Monica 181 Cal.App.4th 1094 (2010) (2/8) At-will employee bus driver fired for some performance problems but also while she was pregnant.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Trial court refused BAJI 12.26 mixed-motive defense instruction, givinginstead CACI 2500 which omits any mixed-motive factor. Error. Mixed-motive defenses is still good law. [2] JNOV properly denied, where some evidence showed other drivers w/ questionable records not fired, plus some positive performance-review comments, would permit jury to find firing motivated by pregnancy.San Diego personal injury attorney.

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 19:48:59 | Permalink | Comments Off

Baker vs National Interstate ins. 363

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
Baker v National Interstate Ins. Co. 180 Cal.App.4th 13319 (2010) (2/8) B’s decedent C killed in bus once owned by FW.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com FW sold bus to C and performed postsale inspections and repairs. B sued for negligent repair and inspection. N refused coverage under standard products hazard exclusion. Exclusion was unambiguous. FW’s inspection constitutes the ‘work’ under the exclusion definition. Lengthy opinion. San Diego personal injury attorney
Posted by sandiegolawyer in 19:28:06 | Permalink | Comments Off

Friday, September 2, 2011

FEHA attorney fees case 364

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.comChavez v City of Los Angeles 47 Cal.4th 970 (2010) Kennard 7-0. FEHA attorney fees case filed as unlimited civil matter, but recovery was “less than half the $25K jurisdictional limit for a limited civil case.”.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Plaintiff requested $871K attorney fees. CCP § 1033(a) gives court discretion to deny attorney fees. Trial court must give “due consideration to policies and objectives of the FEHA in general and its attorney fee provision in particular. But in view of “Plaintiff’s minimal success and grossly inflated attorney fee request,” trial court had discretion to deny attorneyfees totally. San Diego personal injury attorney

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 19:40:44 | Permalink | Comments Off

Friday, August 26, 2011

Doctor awarded $5 million 328

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com
The Supreme Court has stood by a decision that awarded a California doctor $5 million in punitive damages.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com The doctor had sued Lawnwood Medical Center after a hospital executive said “he would not send his dog to the doctor for surgery.” The medical center argued the award was excessive, but the decision was upheld.San Diego personal injury attorney Jesse J. Holland, San Francisco Chronicle 01/10/2011

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 21:13:33 | Permalink | Comments Off

Power balance bracelets product liability 335

Product Liability is another area of  San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.comPower Balance, LLC recently admitted to an Australian court that their Power Balance bracelets don’t have “credible scientific evidence” supporting their claims.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Over 2.5 million bracelets have been sold worldwide and are worn by many popular professional athletes to improve mental and physical performance. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ordered the company to pull its product from the market and provide refunds to consumers.  San Diego personal injury attorney Adam Caparell , New York Daily News  01/05/2011
Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:55:10 | Permalink | Comments Off

Chicago workers discrimination lawsuit 336

Discrimination is anther area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Supervalu Inc. has agreed to a $3.2 million settlement with 110 Chicagoworkers in a discrimination lawsuit over firings at local supermarkets.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com The lawsuit claimed that Supervalu and its Jewel-Osco chain “had a ‘policy and practice’ of terminating employees with disabilities at the end of their medical leaves.” The suit alleged that since 2003, 1,000 employees had been terminated under this policy.  San Diego personal injury attorney Staff Report, Chicago Tribune  01/05/2011

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:54:50 | Permalink | Comments Off

Harbor-UCLA Medical Center medical malpractice 341

Medical Malpractice is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Los Angeles County has approved a $1.175 million settlement with a female patient at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in a medical negligence lawsuit.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com The woman, who was treated at the medical center in 2008, claimed in her suit that one of her blood vessels was inadvertently punctured by a catheter tip during a procedure. The woman suffered further complications from the injury but was released a few days later. San Diego personal injury attorney Rong-Gong Lin II, LA Times 01/04/2011

Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:36:34 | Permalink | Comments Off

New Balance false claim ads lawsuit 342

Premises Liability is another area of  San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

Sneaker company New Balance has been targeted in a lawsuit that claims the company makes false claims in ads for its toning walking shoes.San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com The advertisements claim the shoes burn more calories than regular shoes and improve health. These claims, the suit states, are “false, misleading, and reasonably likely to deceive the public.”  San Diego personal injury attorney Lauren Keiper, Reuters  01/04/2011
Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:15:09 | Permalink | Comments Off

Paint company $1 million lawsuit 343

Premises Liability is another area of San-Diego-Personal-Injury-attorney.com

A California paint company has agreed to pay $1 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of “illegal transportation and mismanagement of hazardous waste and materials.”San-Diego-Auto-Accident-lawyer.com Vista Paint Corp. will pay the settlement to six district attorney’s offices and will also have to improve their training and storage methods. The company allegedly improperly transported paint thinners and solvents, unusable paint materials and rags and absorbents used to clean up spills of hazardous materials.  San Diego personal injury attorney Staff and Wire Reports, The Desert Sun  01/05/2011


Posted by sandiegolawyer in 20:14:39 | Permalink | Comments Off